This is my attempt to list down as many of the rules we have discussed in class as I can. If you think I have left our anything, please let me know. You need to find the cases and or legislation that supports each rule. This can be found in the textbooks.
Formation
Rule that an offer can be made to the world at large ie unilateral offers are valid offers.
Rule that an offer is distinguished from an Invitation to Treat by the intention of the maker.
Rule that offers can be revoked anytime before acceptance as long as it is communicated
Rule that an offer will lapse upon rejection or a counter offer
Rule that acceptance of an offer cannot be qualified.
Rule that the person accepting must have knowledge of the offer
Rule that the acceptance must be communicated
Rule that Past Consideration is not good consideration
Rule that Consideration must move from the promisee
Rule that Consideration must be sufficient but not adequate
Rule Pinnels Case or Foakes v Beer
Rule in High Trees v Central London Properties (Promissory Estoppel)
Rule that in domestic or social agreement there is a presumption of lack of intention to contract
Terms of Contract
Parol Evidence Rule
Rule on business efficacy in determining how the common law implies terms into the agreement
Statutory Implied term on the rights to sell (s12)
Statutory implied term that goods matches its description (s13)
Statutory Implied Terms that goods sold must be satisfactory quality (S14(2))
Statutory Implied Terms that goods sold must be fit for its intended purpose (S14(3))
Statutory Implied Terms that goods must correspond with its sample (S15)
Rule on Warranties, Innominate Terms and Conditions
Rule on the incorporation of exclusion clauses
Rules in the UCTA limiting the rights to exclude liabilities under the SGA
Vitiating Factors
Rule on necessary goods for minors
Rule on restraint if trade
Rule on Misrepresentation – false statement of fact inducing a contract
Rule on Fraudulent, Negligent & Innocent Misrepresentation
Rule on Common Mistake
Rule on Mutual Mistake
Rule on Unilateral mistake
Rule on Economic Duress
Rule on Undue Influence
Rule on Unconscionable Conduct
Discharge
Rule on the doctrine of precise performance and its exceptions
Rule on anticipatory and actual breaches
Rule on existing and subsequent agreements on discharge
Rule on Frustrations
Common Law & Statutory Rules on the effect of Frustrations
Damages
The Restitio In Integrum rule in awarding damages
Rule on causation of damage
Rule on Remoteness of damages (Rule in Hadley v Baxendale)
Rule on Mitigation
Rule on awarding non pecuniary losses in contract
Rule on Penalty Clauses and Liquidated Damage Clause
Rule on expectation loss and reliance loss
Agency
Rules on creation of agencies
Rule on Implied Authorities and Ostensible Authorities of Agents
Rules on Duties of Agents
Rule on undisclosed principals
Negligence
Rule on when a Duty of Care is owed
Rule on Duty of Care in Negligent Statements
Rule on Duty of Care in Nervous Shock cases
Rule on Breach of Duty of Care or the Standard of Care
Rule on Causation in fact and law
Rules on Damages in Tort – Special and General Damages
Rules on the defece of Volenti Non Fit Injuria
Rule on Contributory Negligence
It is important that for each of the above rule – you will have an authority either in the form of a case of in the form of a statutory rule to support each of the rule that you intend to use.
For every question in an exam, the question will raise an issue which a legal rule may be used to help answer the question. You need to identify that issue, discuss the legal rule and apply it to the issue.
Can correct me,does this mean that we only require to learn those that you stated in the above & sub-branch(if any) & not necessarily all the rules stated in the S'pore Business Law Book by Benny S Tabalujan?
ReplyDeleteExample: In the SGA there are more statutory implied stated in the book like Nemo Dat Rule. There is just so much stat to understand in SGA alone & having trouble applying it.
You need to work what is in the syllabus
ReplyDeleteJust to clarify, under Formation, what does the 5th rule: Rule that acceptance cannot be qualified mean?
ReplyDeleteis it possible for you to put asterisks on the rules which are more important? that would really be of great help!
ReplyDeleteMr Yeo,
ReplyDeleteFor quoting of the case, is it necessary to quote the year of the case as well?
For identifying issue, it is better to state exactly what you are trying to investigate in terms of a question or a statement before applying the rule, applications and conclusion?
The rule that acceptance cannot be qualified is that you cannot place conditions to the the offer - it will then make it a counter offer
ReplyDeleteAll the rules are important.
You dont need to quote the year of the case.
Yes it is better to state what the issue is and why it is an issue.
1) remedies in tort of negligence
ReplyDelete2)Rule on Remoteness of damages (Rule in Hadley v Baxendale)
i have qns as mention above
could u explain it ?
Thks
coming from a student myself....
ReplyDeletefor some of the above questions, you can check a dictionary if you do not know the word.
and some of you are just waiting to be spoon-fed!
hi mr yeo,
ReplyDeletewould you kindly explain the concept for the officious bystanders test. can't seem to understand the quote written on the textbook.
thank you!
Officious Bystander Test, refers to the following:
ReplyDelete“Something so obvious that it goes without saying” – Prima Facie
Case: Shirlaw v Southern Foundries Ltd
hi sir,
ReplyDeletewhile i was studying the book im finding that there are some rules missed out completely such as in formation of contract, you didnt mentioni about lapse of time, death,failure of condition are ways of offer is terminated. so does it mean it is not tested ?
Hi Sir, may i know what's the difference between officious bystander test and the business efficacy test? And also, are the limitations of both tests important?
ReplyDeleteThanks!